New Hollywood 1961 - 1990

New Hollywood

Coppola was at the forefront of the so-called 'film school generation', from the 1960s onwards. 

This group also included Steven Spielberg, Martin Scorsese, Brian di Palma and George Lucas. 

This new generation of directors had studied at film school; were well-versed in film theory; had absorbed the influences of New Wave filmmakers in France; were given big budgets with which to work.


From the dawn of cinema, various epitomes of exceptional editing in films are used as examples of how successful manipulation of the footage in postproductions can certainly enhance its image. Editing will most of the time act as the glue, which holds all other elements together.

Between Casablanca and Apocalypse Now, various similar and contrasting editing techniques are employed to achieve appropriate spectatorial effects. A strong illustration of this can be drawn from the introductory sequence of Apocalypse Now and the scene introducing Rick in Casablanca. In AN opening, a traumatised Willard gradually sinks into his subconscious, exploring his memories of Vietnam. The scene starts with an unknown sound, which manifests into a helicopter that flies across the screen in slow motion, an image that holds for two minutes before transitioning. This abstract effect captures the audience’s attention instantly, causing them to question the origin of the sound. Further down the scene, the combination of multiple simultaneous dissolves slowly replicate Willard’s dazed and disoriented state, developing his character straight away – from this editorial effect alone, the spectator is brought inside Willard’s body, and are able to tell Willard is suffering from withdrawal of the Vietnam war. After filming over 200 hours of footage, Coppola sent editors Walter Murch and Richard Marks the clips with the mission of constructing the his visualisation of Hearts Of Darkness.



-       Deep Depth of field
-       Technological innovation allowed for extreme tracking shots.

-       Long take, forces spectator to suffer through the explicit imagery

-       One of the most important characters in the film [Kilgore] has no close ups.

-       A lot of shouting represents the pandemonium

-       Brown and orange colour scheme

-       Costume of Kilgore: Cowboy hat = American individualism and advancementship and self evaluation, Yellow shirt = Confidence(as he’s more visible to Charlie)

-       Birds blocking the sky = religious connotation (priest scene)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The oedipal trajectory

The oedipal trajectory - Males - Summary A male child, who at first is bonded with his mother, imagines himself a united whole with her. However, when held up to a mirror, he perceives his difference from her. He becomes aware of the illusion of unity and still desires it. The desire now because sexual. He comes to hate his father, as his father has ‘lawful’ access to the mother. The child perceives this difference as one of castration: he sees the mother as castrated. To identify with her would this mean he would be without his penis - in identifying with her he becomes like her; in uniting with her, he runs the risk of castration from his father (he assumes the father has this power) He attempts to identify with the father; he sets about trying to find a female. The male child can now move towards social stability and continue the cycle. Application in Film Narrative In cinematic narrative, the male protagonist moves, through the resolution of a crisis,
Read more

Fish Tank HW 13.12.18

How useful has an ideological critical approach been in understanding binary oppositions in the narratives of your chosen films? The narrative of Fish Tank does not really provide a wide variety of enigmatical or hinting codes throughout its 2h 4m runtime, thus making way for the spectator to understand and form sympathy for the characters of the film or contrastingly feel an indefference towards a character (an antagonist perhaps). The ideological critical approach use in this film, known as british social realism, presents an authentic, gritty prespective on the lives of individuals in low ecomimically gifted children. Certain moments in the film show the desperate scenearios these individuals have to go through, such as Mia’s fatherless child hood or kayla’s young smoking habit. The way these characters are represented in the film spark thought in a spectator’s mind about the different situations others find themselves, and certain scenes encourage the spectator to imagine thems
Read more

Section C assesment 21.01.2018

Image
The craft of creating a film, who’s narrative structure presents certain binary oppositions that when looked at in depth have connecitons to an ideological critical approach can sometimes be used to understand things like the reasoning for an auter’s methods and style per say. In the Andrea Arnold film, Fishtank , one of the opposition that exist is the Youth vs. Adult oppsition that exists between character’s such as Mia and her mother, Joanne, or even some may interpret the relationship beteen Tyla and Mia to represent a Binary oppsition. However the more intriguing Youth vs Old binary conflict is the one between Mia and Conor, which throughout the film’s runtime progresses to become a maternal opposition, and eventually interfers with a seperate opposition - the one between Mia and Connor’s legitimate daughter. For instance, at first sight, Mia recognises Conor as a stranger - one which naturaly doesn’t to spend time with her out
Read more